The Diversion Program Implementation Under the Juvenile Justice System Act in Indonesia: What Works, What Does Not?

Authors

  • Septy Juwita Agustin Br Tobing Directorate General of Corrections

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61682/restorative.v2i1.12

Keywords:

Juvenile, Justice system, Diversion

Abstract

The Juvenile Justice System Act of Indonesia No 11 year 2012 that has been implemented in 2013 has brought some changes in how the criminal justice institutions in Indonesia managed the juvenile cases, including the correctional system. One of the most prominent things exhibited in this Act is the diversion program for juvenile offender as it would help to minimize the number of juvenile imprisonment and prevent them away from the juvenile court process. However, for the first five years of the implementation of this Act, there had no evaluation on how this diversion program had been carried out. This study aims to portray the effectiveness of the diversion programs based on the perceptions of 101 probation and parole officers in Indonesia who are involved in this study. The study result will help the practitioners and also the related stakeholders to improve the implementation of the diversion program.

[Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak yang telah diimplementasikan pada tahun 2013 telah membawa sejumlah perubahan terkait bagaimana lembaga penegakan hukum di Indonesia menangani tindak pidana di bawah umur, termasuk sistem pemasyarakatan. Salah satu kebijakan yang paling menonjol yang diatur dalam undang-undang ini adalah program diversi bagi pelaku remaja, yang dapat membantu mengurangi jumlah pemenjaraan anak di bawah umur dan mencegah mereka menjalani proses sidang pengadilan remaja. Namun, selama lima tahun pertama implementasi kebijakan ini tidak pernah ada evaluasi mengenai pelaksanaan program diversi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan efektivitas program diversi berdasarkan persepsi 101 orang Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan di Indonesia yang dilibatkan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian ini akan membantu para praktisi dan pemangku kepentingan (stakeholder) lain untuk memperbaiki implementasi program diversi.]

References

Amstutz, L.S and Zehr.H. (1998). Victim Offender Conferencing in Pennsylvania’s Juvenile Justice System. Retrieved from https://emu.edu/cms-links/cjp/docs/rjmanual.pdf

Bauer, M., Bordeaux. G., Cole, J., Davidson, W. S., (1980). A diversion program for juvenile offenders: The experience of Ingham county. Michigan, 31 Juv. & Fam. Ct. J. 53

Becker, H. (1973). Outsiders; studies in the sociology of deviance (Expanded ed.). New York: Free Press.

Blanco, M., Miller, D., & Peck, G. (2007). How effective are Virginia’s juvenile diversion programs? A quantitative and qualitative assessment for the Virginia state crime commission. Retrieved from https://www.wm.edu/as/publicpolicy/documents/prs/crime.pdf.

Buffington. K., Dierkhising. C.B., Marsh, S.C. (2010). Ten things every juvenile court judge should know about trauma and delinquency. National council of juvenile and family court judges bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.ncjfcj.org/sites/default/files/trauma%20bulletin_1.pdf

Canagarayar, J.K. (1980). Diversion: A new perspective in criminal justice. 22 Canadian J. Criminology 168.

DeAngelo, A.J., (1988). Diversion programs in the juvenile justice system: An alternative method of treatment for juvenile offenders. 39 Juv. & Fam. Ct. J. 21.

Dembo, R., Wareham, J., Schmeidler. J., & Chirikos, T. N. (2005). Evaluation of the impact of a policy change on diversion program recidivism and justice system costs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 41:3, 93-122, DOI: 10.1300/J076v41n03_04

Greenwood.J., Fercello.C., Umbreit.J., and Umbreit, M.S. (2000). National Survey of Victim-Offender Mediation Programs. Center for Restorative Justice & Peacemaking. Minnesota:University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://rjp.umn.edu/sites/g/files/pua5026/f/media/national_survey_of_vom_programs.pdf

Grosso. N. D., Kay, B., Bergum, J. (1982). Pre and post adjudication, post incarceration - pros and cons (from restitution programs in juvenile and family court). Tape R-6 - See NCJ-91403).

Juvenile diversion guide book: Models for change provides guidance for juvenile diversion programs (2011). Retrieved from http://www.njjn.org/article/models-for-change-provides-guidance-for-juvenile-diversion-programs

Kretschmar, J., Tossone, K., Butcher, F., & Marsh, B. (2018). Examining the impact of a juvenile justice diversion program for youth with behavioral health concerns on early adulthood recidivism. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.010

Lander, L., Howsare, J., & Byrne, M. (2013). The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice. Social work in public health, 28(3-4), 194-205.Panzer, C. (1997). Reducing Juvenile Recidivism through Pre-Trial Diversion Programs: Community's Involvement. Journal of Juvenile Law 18, 186-208

Mardite, H. (2005). The juvenile justice system in Indonesia. Presentation on the 129th UNAFEI International Senior Seminar on Effective Prevention of Crime Associated with Urbanization Based Upon Community Involvement and Prevention of Youth Crime and Juvenile Delinquency. UNAFEI: Tokyo. Retrieved from https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No68/No68_16PA_Mardite.pdf.

Maruyama, G., & Ryan, C. (2014). Research methods in social relations (8th ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, UK ;: Wiley Blackwell.

Nacci, P.L. (1978). The importance of recidivism, research in understanding criminal behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice Volume 6, Issue 3, Autumn 1978, Pages 253-260. Retrieved from https://ac.els-cdn.com/0047235278900077/1-s2.0-0047235278900077-main.pdf?_tid=5ef36f6e-aeac-414a-9dcb-56d0234d2b9b&acdnat=1522192623_ef775ade3d46f68660683121aabf5370

Reker, G.T., Cote. J.E., Peacock. E.J. (1980). Juvenile Diversion: Conceptual issues and program effectiveness. 22 Canadian J. Criminology 36.

Schwalbe, C., Gearing, R., Mackenzie, M., Brewer, K., & Ibrahim, R. (2012). A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.002

Wilson, H. A., & Hoge, R. D. (2013). Diverting our attention to what works: evaluating the effectiveness of a youth diversion program. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 11(4), 313. doi:10.1177/1541204012473132

Wilson, H. A., & Hoge, R. D. (2013). The Effect of Youth Diversion Programs on Recidivism: A Meta-Analytic Review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(5), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812451089

Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books

Downloads

Published

30-04-2024

How to Cite

Juwita Agustin Br Tobing, S. (2024). The Diversion Program Implementation Under the Juvenile Justice System Act in Indonesia: What Works, What Does Not?. Restorative : Journal of Indonesian Probation and Parole System, 2(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.61682/restorative.v2i1.12

Issue

Section

Articles