Eksplorasi Interaksi Publik, Sentimen, dan Diskursus Tema Reintegrasi Sosial di Platform YouTube
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61682/restorative.v2i2.14Keywords:
Discursive Opportunity Structure, public interaction, social media sentiment, social reintegrationAbstract
Abstract. This study aims to analyze public engagement on social media, specifically YouTube. This study also focuses on audience participation, sentiment distribution in comments, and key themes in public discourse related to videos discussing social reintegration. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis using Pearson Correlation and Qualitative Analysis through sentiment analysis with RapidMiner and thematic analysis with Atlas.ti. The results indicate that although some channels attract high view counts, active engagement such as comments and likes is often disproportional, influenced by content quality and topic relevance. Most comments analyzed were neutral, primarily addressing procedural information, while negative sentiments frequently criticized social reintegration policies. These findings highlight the need for more creative and interactive content strategies by leveraging Discursive Opportunity Structure (DOS) to enhance public engagement. In conclusion, social media holds significant potential as a tool for educating and advocating social reintegration policies, but it requires a more responsive and relevant approach to maximize public participation and discussion.
Abstrak.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keterlibatan publik pada media sosial, khususnya YouTube. Penelitian ini juga berfokus pada partisipasi penonton, distribusi sentimen dalam komentar, dan tema utama dalam diskursus terkait video yang membahas reintegrasi sosial. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode campuran dengan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui analisis korelasi Pearson dan pendekatan kualitatif melalui analisis sentimen menggunakan RapidMiner serta analisis tematik menggunakan Atlas.ti. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun beberapa kanal memperoleh jumlah tayangan yang tinggi, tingkat keterlibatan aktif seperti komentar dan suka tidak selalu sebanding, hal tersebut dipengaruhi oleh kualitas konten dan relevansi topik. Sebagian besar komentar yang dianalisis bersifat netral dan berfokus pada informasi prosedural, sedangkan sentimen negatif umumnya mengkritisi kebijakan reintegrasi sosial. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi perlunya strategi konten yang lebih kreatif dan interaktif dengan memanfaatkan Struktur Peluang Diskursif untuk meningkatkan keterlibatan publik. Kesimpulannya, media sosial memiliki potensi besar sebagai alat edukasi dan advokasi kebijakan reintegrasi sosial, namun diperlukan pendekatan yang lebih responsif dan relevan untuk memaksimalkan partisipasi dan diskusi publik.
References
Abbas, A., Zhou, Y., Fordham University, Deng, S., Shanghai International Studies University, Zhang, P., & Shanghai Jiaotong University. (2018). Text Analytics to Support Sense-Making in Social Media: A Language-Action Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 42(2), 427–464. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13239
Boréus, K., Bradley, K., & Tornhill, S. (2024). Breaking through banal consumerism? Representations of postconsumerist perspectives in mainstream press media. Journal of Consumer Culture, 24(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405231199294
Guo, J., & Chen, H.-T. (2022). How does political engagement on social media impact psychological well-being? Examining the mediating role of social capital and perceived social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107248
Hidayati, I. (2018). THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON MIGRATION DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES: Case of Indonesian Student in University of Groningen. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 6(1), 515. https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.38010
Idris, I. K. (2018). Government Social Media in Indonesia: Just Another Information Dissemination Tool. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3404-20
Indra, L. N., Gita Sukmono, F., & Kurniawan, D. (2022). The Function of Social Media in Creating Participatory Based Government Policies in Indonesia. Human Interaction & Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2022): Artificial Intelligence & Future Applications. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002761
Koopmans, R., & Olzak, S. (2004). Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198–230. https://doi.org/10.1086/386271
Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 4(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.4.2.d7593370607l6756
Lee, F. L., & Fong, I. W. (2023). The construction and mobilization of political consumerism through digital media in a networked social movement. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3573–3592. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211050885
Lee, J., & Abidin, C. (2023). Introduction to the Special Issue of “TikTok and Social Movements.” Social Media + Society, 9(1), 205630512311574. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157452
Madsen, V. T. (2022). Making sense of internal social media and participatory communication: Exploring the employee perspective in a change process in a public sector organization. Journal of Communication Management, 26(4), 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-01-2022-0002
Majumder, N., Hazarika, D., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., & Poria, S. (2018). Multimodal sentiment analysis using hierarchical fusion with context modeling. Knowledge-Based Systems, 161, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.041
Mäntylä, M. V., Graziotin, D., & Kuutila, M. (2018). The evolution of sentiment analysis—A review of research topics, venues, and top cited papers. Computer Science Review, 27, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.10.002
Mintarsih, A. R. (2019). Facebook, Polymedia, Social Capital, and a Digital Family of Indonesian Migrant Domestic Workers: A Case Study of The Voice of Singapore’s Invisible Hands. Migration, Mobility, & Displacement, 4(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.18357/mmd41201918971
Molaei, H. (2015). Discursive opportunity structure and the contribution of social media to the success of social movements in Indonesia. Information, Communication & Society, 18(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.934388
Myrczik, J., Kajta, J., Buckenleib, A., Karolak, M., Liedtke, M., Mrozowicki, A., & Trappmann, V. (2024). Becoming a young radical right activist: Biographical pathways of the members of radical right organisations in Poland and Germany. Current Sociology, 00113921241239644. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921241239644
Noor, H. (2024). From Villain to Hero: The Role of Disengaged Terrorists in Social Reintegration Initiatives. Politics and Governance, 12, 7838. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7838
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
Qadri, M. (2020). PENGARUH MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM MEMBANGUN OPINI PUBLIK. Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 1(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.24239/qaumiyyah.v1i1.4
Santi, I. N., & Fadjar, A. (2020). The Function of Social Media as a Promotion Tool for Tourism Destinations. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific International Conference of Management and Business Science (AICMBS 2019). 3rd Asia Pacific International Conference of Management and Business Science (AICMBS 2019), Batu, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200410.020
Zhao, X., Zhan, M., & Jie, C. (2018). Examining multiplicity and dynamics of publics’ crisis narratives with large-scale Twitter data. Public Relations Review, 44(4), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Umaruddin
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.