25 Tahun Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan : Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61682/restorative.v3i1.24Abstract
This article utilises bibliometric analysis that aims to summarise several research studies with a common theme, namely probation and parole officers. The source used in this research is Scopus, covering the period from 2000 to 2025. After data reduction was conducted according to the established categories, we obtained 906 documents. The result of the research shows that there is an increasing trend in the number of research studies on probation and parole officers over the years, with 2022 being the peak of the publication number. The most recent research focuses on probation officers and includes keywords such as procedural justice, perception, and social work.
Artikel ini menggunakan analisis bibliometrik yang bertujuan untuk merangkum beberapa penelitian dengan tema pembimbing kemasyarakatan. Sumber data penelitian ini diperoleh dari Scopus periode tahun 2000—2025. Setelah dilakukan reduksi data sesuai dengan kategori yang telah ditetapkan, diperoleh 906 dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penelitian terkait pembimbing kemasyarakatan mengalami tren peningkatan tiap tahunnya, di mana tahun 2022 menjadi tahun dengan publikasi terbanyak. Fokus terbaru penelitian yang berhubungan dengan pembimbing kemasyarakatan meliputi kata kunci procedural justice, perception, dan social work.
References
Blasko, B. L., Viglione, J., Toronjo, H., & Taxman, F. S. (2015). Probation Officer–Probation Agency Fit: Understanding Disparities in the Use of Motivational Interviewing Techniques
Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T.-L., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. (2008). Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 248-270.
Bourgon, G. (2013). The demands on probation officers in the evolution of evidence-based practice: The forgotten foot soldier of community corrections. Federal Probation Journal, 77(2), 5-18.
Fitzgibbon, W. (2021). Probation and social justice: Examining the role of probation in reducing social inequalities. The British Journal of Criminology, 61(2), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa073
Graham, S., & Lowery, B. S. (2004). Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(5), 483-504.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
Shapland, J., Bottoms, A., Farrall, S., McNeill, F., Priede, C., & Robinson, G. (2012). The quality of probation supervision: A literature review. Centre for Criminological Research, University of Sheffield.
Taxman, F. S., Henderson, C. E., & Belenko, S. (2020). The impact of workload and organizational factors on probation officers’ decision-making. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 59(5), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2020.1725703
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(1), 84-94.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Panggih Priyo Subagyo, Khoirun Nisak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
